Is this rebellious?
I have an explosion of thoughts when I read this:
- Why does this statement feel revolutionary in 2018?
- Why do women need to be saved and men be our saviours?
- Could this line ever read: “And the princess and prince lived happily ever after in their own big castle with all their own money and they took care of themselves and each other. The end.”
- Is women’s happiness a story of being saved by a man vs saved by herself?
- How does a man support a women who is 100% independent?
- What if a princess wants another princess to move in with her?
I love these quotes, they are gung-ho and make me think big. They also seem to sit very much in the same story – prioritising material wealth with no mention of romantic, emotional or spiritual abundance. Yes, we need a roof over our heads but we also need SO MUCH MORE!
Yes, we need independence but I for one want lots of love, romance and a partner in my life.
Are love and independence mutually exclusive (I hope not)?
Does a feminist re-make of fairytales exclude love?
If you could write your own fairytale in one or two sentences, what would your happily ever after story be?
And the successful business women, lived happily ever after, in her own lavish townhouse, travelled everywhere lots, loved and was loved lots, felt like she belonged all the time, had her own cleaner, and shared all her favourite stories with a gorgeous independent man who loved her just as she was, and she took care of herself and all her abundance (money, spirituality, health) and always wore fabulous clothes and red nail polish…. and just really had a great time always! The end! 🙂